wife anandi - Page 5

of course ppl here listen/read only those things which they want 2 listen/read.

I agree with aparna,

If the police raids a place without proper evidence collection, it can become a serious human rights issue. People may not like the fact that i tend to quote from real life examples, but there is nothing like an actual incident to highlight the complexities involved.
When the Aam Admi Party was in government in Delhi, the law minister took along the police to raid a suspected drug cum brothel house. The police rounded up half a dozen African women residents of the house -- they were headed home in a taxi -- and forcibly took them for medical examination.
The raid exploded into a major controversy with rights activists up in arms over the manner in which it was conducted. The government used the plea that they had numerous complaints from residents of the area but the right activists argued that women cannot be mistreated on a mere suspicion.

There were clearly two sides to the issue: the govt's case was that they were acting on strong complaints. The activists made it into a human tights issue saying the women had been victimised by the police.

A case like this in reality would have caused activists to ask if the police had done due diligence. Anandi could have been acting ad a rights activist.

Also we have come a long way in our understanding of sex work. Sex workers are now treated as victims and the earlier practice of arresting them to a blaze of media publicity is no longer viewed as the valid way to treat the issue. A difference is made between pimps and brothel owners and sex workers who ply their trade out of compulsion

Originally posted by: rohini55

I agree with aparna,

If the police raids a place without proper evidence collection, it can become a serious human rights issue. People may not like the fact that i tend to quote from real life examples, but there is nothing like an actual incident to highlight the complexities involved.
When the Aam Admi Party was in government in Delhi, the law minister took along the police to raid a suspected drug cum brothel house. The police rounded up half a dozen African women residents of the house -- they were headed home in a taxi -- and forcibly took them for medical examination.
The raid exploded into a major controversy with rights activists up in arms over the manner in which it was conducted. The government used the plea that they had numerous complaints from residents of the area but the right activists argued that women cannot be mistreated on a mere suspicion.

There were clearly two sides to the issue: the govt's case was that they were acting on strong complaints. The activists made it into a human tights issue saying the women had been victimised by the police.

A case like this in reality would have caused activists to ask if the police had done due diligence. Anandi could have been acting ad a rights activist.

Also we have come a long way in our understanding of sex work. Sex workers are now treated as victims and the earlier practice of arresting them to a blaze of media publicity is no longer viewed as the valid way to treat the issue. A difference is made between pimps and brothel owners and sex workers who ply their trade out of compulsion

tinoo, how can you insult donkeys or monkeys or parrots or chameleons?😆

Originally posted by: leavesandwaves

tinoo, how can you insult donkeys or monkeys or parrots or chameleons?😆

Since the question whether Anandi is stupid and duffer wife

@blushing
An instinctively humane DC like Shiv should have handled the case far more sensitively than he has been shown to. For the simple reason that while Premila is the lynchpin and therefore clearly guilty of committing a serious crime, the same cannot be said of the girls who may have been under all kinds of threats.

Shiv could have sent a decoy and caught premila redhanded. At the same time he should have ensured the girls were protected and not subject to media scrutiny and ridicule.

I thought the track was to highlight human trafficking. It has instead highlighted husband and wife divergence of perception.

exactly...yesterday we seen Shiv figure it out Anandi won't agree till he get full proof

Originally posted by: rohini55

@blushing
An instinctively humane DC like Shiv should have handled the case far more sensitively than he has been shown to. For the simple reason that while Premila is the lynchpin and therefore clearly guilty of committing a serious crime, the same cannot be said of the girls who may have been under all kinds of threats.

Shiv could have sent a decoy and caught premila redhanded. At the same time he should have ensured the girls were protected and not subject to media scrutiny and ridicule.

I thought the track was to highlight human trafficking. It has instead highlighted husband and wife divergence of perception.

@rohini...