Oh, believe me I was a complete supporter of India being a secular state and believed in State and religion should be different. But words should be backed by actions and secularism should not remain on paper only. If the state blatantly discriminates based on religion and shows favouritism towards the minorities, what's the use. It's better to have a state with a religion than a pseudo-secular state.
I completely hear you and believe you for having known you over 500 posts :) 👏. I am once again questioning majority. Just as certain political parties are being partial to certain minorities, several political leaders are instigating majorities, via issues like the Ram Mandir in Ayodhya.
If one really cares for Hindus and their life in India, so much more could be done. Ram Mandir is not even symbolic to me .. See where I am coming from? My love and respect for my religion is beyond that mandir there.
Ofcourse favoritism is hurtful and wrong. Ofcourse one should speak against it. But what's your motto here in demolishing mosque? Aren't you ( not you in particular, but the individual) just being one of them 😛