Originally posted by: ...Diala...
bunnylovessunny.. offtopic.. Kauravas were not test tube babies.. they were fused inside and grown outside while test tube babies are the right opposite..
Whatever! Nothing gives them the right to change its story and create their own.Originally posted by: bunnylovessunny
<font face="Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif">There is NOTHING traditional about Mahabharat!</font>
<font face="Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif">We have test tube babies (Kauravas)</font><font face="Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif">Teenage pregnancy (Kunti)</font><font face="Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif">Polygamy and Polyandry (Almost everyone except the role he played! No wonder he's complaining)</font><font face="Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif">Babies born from various fathers.</font><font face="Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif">A married man and a married woman are FRIENDS (Krishna and Draupadi) Although I don't see anything wrong there, but apparently, TRADITIONALLY, it is wrong.</font><font face="Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif">Nope, Mahabharat is not ALL traditional my pal... It is an epic from a yug where people learnt deceit, cruelty, ignorance, selfishness and pride. Mahabharat is a Political drama where all kinds of illegal things took place and illegitimate children were born. So does it really matter HOW it is being portrayed? </font>
Also, Srimad Bhagavad gita, Vishnu sahasranama etc emerged from Mahabharata only.Originally posted by: Daya_Manic
Whatever! Nothing gives them the right to change its story and create their own.
Originally posted by: Daya_Manic
Whatever! Nothing gives them the right to change its story and create their own.
Nowadays the makers hide behind an excuse that they are making Mahabharata for the modern people.
He said: "Sanskriti kabhi modern nahi ho sakti, sanskriti ko modern karoge toh woh khatm ho jayegi"
comment:
p_commentcount