W*F**kery of Priyadarshani - Criteria for NA

Page

Next Last

ViccoTurmeric

@ViccoTurmeric

Sparkler

+ 3

Posted: 8 years ago

Quote

Frequent Posters

desigal90

@desigal90

Trailblazer

+ 5

Posted: 8 years ago

Nothing he says makes sense. And he clearly says the crieteria for best actor and actress is different. For actor it was body of work but for actress it was the acting. W*F even?

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

Shona4Salman

@Shona4Salman

Inactive

Posted: 8 years ago

Someone please explain to me in English what is being said here.

Quote

745671

Suspended

Posted: 8 years ago

^Nothing. He's just looking for excuses for the bizarre selections. He obviously can't outright just say that he wanted to give it to his friends.

And Ash even being in the running is hilarious.

Weren't people here giving lectures about the body of work not mattering to justify some of their favorites getting the awards before? 😆

Edited by anonymous39 - 8 years ago

Quote

Shona4Salman

@Shona4Salman

Inactive

Posted: 8 years ago

Exactly , if "body of work" was criteria, even Salman SRK should get NA.

This is all BS to justify Akk's award.

Quote

pallavi25

@pallavi25

Inactive

+ 5

Posted: 8 years ago

Originally posted by: anonymous39
^Nothing. He's just looking for excuses for the bizarre selections. He obviously can't outright just say that he wanted to give it to his friends.

And Ash even being in the running is hilarious.

Weren't people here giving lectures about the body of work not mattering to justify some of their favorites getting the awards before? 😆

Jawab mil gaya 😆

In their faces 😆

Never knew Priyadarshan is so full of BS ...used to like some of his movies

Quote

Sree

@Katyayani_devi

Trailblazer

+ 6

Posted: 8 years ago

oh he is chairman tats y his criterias are visible in awards ,how difficult might be for him to select his criterias from regional to hindi lol,waise wat he is smoking with tat excuses lol