Barrister Babu Episode Discussion Thread - Page 36

Originally posted by: shirin04

well unless and until she can prove that ARC did not intend to kill him or the fact that cc is alive, there is no way arc will he let go. Whether cc was a rap*ist or murderer is of no importance in fact it might worsen his case because it would give him more of an intention to kill him since he did that. So in a way by telling tupur's truth they are helping subhodh because till now arc did not have an motive to kill him but now he does.

She needs to prove that cc is alive or need to prove that it was self defence which can be proved if someone had seen cc take out the gun first. If there is a witness to cc taking the gun out first then arc will be released . She needs to focus on how the gun came into the scene instead of tapur's story because it will make the situation worse.

In law there are two things that constitute a crime -actus rea (guilty action) and mens rea(guilty mind). A car accident for example has only actus rea as the intention was not there but a planned homicide constitute both. By telling tapur's truth she is essentially giving the motive and that will help subhodh to literally prove that he planned on killing him.

This is what the real life situation is baki ka show mein toh pta nh.

Thanks babe for the input!

Exactly. The intention to kill has been given now and that makes it difficult to prove that ARC did not intent to murder him.

I guess, Subhodh is gonna use this point and bring the ball back into his court.

Bondita is gonna be blindsided by this, in a way, which is good because phela case hai ladki ka 😆 Itni asani se thodi na jeet sakti hai against a barrister that has ten times her experience.

Originally posted by: Tinnie96

I want to ask something, in the rage Ani said that he will kill CC but who actually brought the gun? CC! And both Trilochan and Kalindi witnessed this, right? Ani just said but the action was started by CC, isn't there a difference between saying and doing? I was having a verbal fight with my friend and she angrily said that she will kill me but she didn't and criminals never say that they will kill but they do kill, why will the culprit openly say that he will kill someone? Don't the police and judge know this?

Aur isi tarah hamara popat hota hai 😊so dekhte hai ye makers karte kiya hai......

Originally posted by: .Rinnie.

Thanks babe for the input!

Exactly. The intention to kill has been given now and that makes it difficult to prove that ARC did not intent to murder him.

I guess, Subhodh is gonna use this point and bring the ball back into his court.

Bondita is gonna be blindsided by this, in a way, which is good because phela case hai ladki ka 😆 Itni asani se thodi na jeet sakti hai against a barrister that has ten times her experience.

Originally posted by: Tinnie96

I want to ask something, in the rage Ani said that he will kill CC but who actually brought the gun? CC! And both Trilochan and Kalindi witnessed this, right? Ani just said but the action was started by CC, isn't there a difference between saying and doing? I was having a verbal fight with my friend and she angrily said that she will kill me but she didn't and criminals never say that they will kill but they do kill, why will the culprit openly say that he will kill someone? Don't the police and judge know this?

Aur isi tarah hamara popat hota hai 😊so dekhte hai ye makers karte kiya hai......

I don't think anyone saw CC point the gun or bring it out in the fight. They came when they both were wrestling the gun away.

It isn't so simple as the difference between saying and doing. Some people do announce they will kill someone and actually commit the murder because they are people who have no control over their rage, while some might just say it and do not commit the crime, while others never say anything then go on a murder spree... 😆 Every individual is different so you cannot apply the same logic for each case.

In ARC's case, his anger and behavior towards CC was witnessed by many people and the crime being committed was also witnessed by everyone including his own family.

The only motive they had so far was that he had some enmity towards CC but now, with Tapur in the picture, they have a reason for the murder which is quite strong.

Originally posted by: shirin04

wahi i have no idea itna tapur truth pe woh fixated q hai that's not going to change anything. She needs to focus on the gun. And would actually love some good court room drama with her being intelligent and manipulate because that's what lawyers are supposed to be. But I don't think bb makers have the capacity to write such intelligent stuff.

Even, I'm quite confused about this fixation but then, I realize she has NO clue about CC being alive or what is happening on that end of things so like Ashley said Bondita probably thinks that it's a case of provocation where ARC tried to save Tapur from CC but CC tried to fight back thus it all ended up in such a mess.

But, wo karne ke baad bhi, it won't be enough to let him off, it will only lesser his sentence from death to life imprisonment.

She is being smart and manipulative outside the court 😆 But, I shouldn't judge since we are yet to see the court room drama properly. Kal pata chalega how she plans to tackle the case with what proof she has in her hands. It's all about how you present it, there are cases where murder has happened with proof but a good lawyer can turn it all around by giving the most convincing narrative that fits everything into place.

Originally posted by: .Rinnie.

Even, I'm quite confused about this fixation but then, I realize she has NO clue about CC being alive or what is happening on that end of things so like Ashley said Bondita probably thinks that it's a case of provocation where ARC tried to save Tapur from CC but CC tried to fight back thus it all ended up in such a mess.

But, wo karne ke baad bhi, it won't be enough to let him off, it will only lesser his sentence from death to life imprisonment.

She is being smart and manipulative outside the court 😆 But, I shouldn't judge since we are yet to see the court room drama properly. Kal pata chalega how she plans to tackle the case with what proof she has in her hands. It's all about how you present it, there are cases where murder has happened with proof but a good lawyer can turn it all around by giving the most convincing narrative that fits everything into place.

Bon does not know about cc being alive but I did not see her actually examining the dead body or talking to a doc , thinking about how the gun came etc etc. These questions are more important because circumstantial evidence is more relevant than assumption evidence.

Originally posted by: .Rinnie.

Even, I'm quite confused about this fixation but then, I realize she has NO clue about CC being alive or what is happening on that end of things so like Ashley said Bondita probably thinks that it's a case of provocation where ARC tried to save Tapur from CC but CC tried to fight back thus it all ended up in such a mess.

But, wo karne ke baad bhi, it won't be enough to let him off, it will only lesser his sentence from death to life imprisonment.

She is being smart and manipulative outside the court 😆 But, I shouldn't judge since we are yet to see the court room drama properly. Kal pata chalega how she plans to tackle the case with what proof she has in her hands. It's all about how you present it, there are cases where murder has happened with proof but a good lawyer can turn it all around by giving the most convincing narrative that fits everything into place.

Bondita will definitely manipulate the whole matter in such a way ani will be proved innocent to some point. Then she will need more proof. That's when she will know about cc and get him to the court. Before that ani punishment will definitely get lessened

Originally posted by: .Rinnie.

Even, I'm quite confused about this fixation but then, I realize she has NO clue about CC being alive or what is happening on that end of things so like Ashley said Bondita probably thinks that it's a case of provocation where ARC tried to save Tapur from CC but CC tried to fight back thus it all ended up in such a mess.

But, wo karne ke baad bhi, it won't be enough to let him off, it will only lesser his sentence from death to life imprisonment.

She is being smart and manipulative outside the court 😆 But, I shouldn't judge since we are yet to see the court room drama properly. Kal pata chalega how she plans to tackle the case with what proof she has in her hands. It's all about how you present it, there are cases where murder has happened with proof but a good lawyer can turn it all around by giving the most convincing narrative that fits everything into place.

That is exactly what I am expecting actually, that Bon proves provocation and she proves accident as well... Because that gun was accidently fired, and that has eyewitnesses. She is clearly doing something more than just Tapur if all her work is to be believed. Also, in British India especially, the laws were actually quite a mess, mainly because they had to balance the laws with religious implementations.

Originally posted by: shirin04

wohi i am saying that the provocation/self defence of tapur(yes arc can murder cc in self defence to protect tapur according to law ) but since they had left that place and were on the open street arc cannot murder him. Then the question would be like you should have called the police.

Bon does not know about cc being alive but I did not see her actually examining the dead body or talking to a doc , thinking about how the gun came etc etc. These questions are more important because circumstantial evidence is more relevant than assumption evidence.

Yup! That's the first question they will put up against him - Police ko kyun nahi bhulaya, kisi aur ko kyun nahi bhulaya, etc etc. And he is Barrister, at that, so it sounds more silly that he didn't think of all these things before acting.

Arre arre.... Baat ki na doctor se 😆 Dr.Somnath Bhai MBBS 🤣

True though, the actual line of investigation should have gone there but I guess the show makers did not want to go all CID:Tulsipur on us 😆 Court dikha rahe hai wohi badi baat hai.. itna zyaada investigation nahi ho payega.

Originally posted by: Anu234

Bondita will definitely manipulate the whole matter in such a way ani will be proved innocent to some point. Then she will need more proof. That's when she will know about cc and get him to the court. Before that ani punishment will definitely get lessened