Priest says the union will disturb time, and will bring about destruction.
Also says Mahavir will be the cause of Dhruv's death.
https://www.instagram.com/p/CtjhJkYKdr0/?hl=en
My $0.02 on this
The baba/pundit seems to talk about the wheels of time, and I don't think Senapati is aware of Dhruv's status as a time-traveller. So while the initial suspicion goes towards Rajpurohit/Senapati, this line probably takes them out of the equation.
If you assume that the priest isn't sent by Senapati, what he speaks makes technical sense in a weird way.
Their marriage will affect the time line- true.
Dhruv's "death" is certain because he is technically wiping himself out of the timeline by going to the 17th century (and possibly staying there by marrying her)
And that "death" comes by Bhaiji because he is encouraging the marriage, and creating a new timeline where the current Dhruv probably wipes his future self out of existence.
OR--------------another theory-------------------------- (not very nice though)
Assume Mahavir died in the original time-line.
Because he survived, time demands someone else die (and take his place) in the new timeline, and that is what the priest is telling (Dhruv will die if he stays in the 17th century) , because time demands balance
comment:
p_commentcount